Sustainable usage of cleaner fish against salmon louse requires that it must not be able to transmit diseases to farmed salmon.
This is the key message in a risk assessment conducted by the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment (VKM) on behalf by the Norwegian Food Safety Authority.
Risks of infection and disease
Cleaner fish comprises one of several methods against fighting salmon lice infestations.
Current regulations reguires removal of all fish, including cleaner fish, from the aquaculture farm following completion of each production cycle of salmon. The Norwegian Food Safety
Authority considers changing the legislation, so that cleaner fish may be allowed to be reused over multiple production cycles.
VKM has assessed the risks of transmitting infection and disease should cleaner fish be reused. In addition, VKM assessed whether relocation of cleaner fish may result in the spread of pancreas disease, from areas endemic for this disease to areas free from it.
Largest risks from wild-caught cleaner fish
Both wild-caught and farmed cleaner fish are used to fight salmon louse.
- Knowledge on diseases and infections in wild-caught cleaner fish is generally poor. Use of such fish may result in exposing farmed salmon to new pathogenic agents. Therefore, wild-caught cleaner fish represent a larger risk of transmitting infection than farmed cleaner fish, says Espen Rimstad, who is the spokesperson of this opinion.
The risks can be reduced by stocking and inspecting these fish prior to releasing them into the net pens.
Amoebic gill disease
VKM concludes that amoebic gill disease is currently the single known disease, for which there are justified suspiscions of disease transmission from cleaner fish to farmed salmon.
- Farmed salmon are vaccinated against agents like furunculosis and classical vibrosis. We consider the risks of transmitting bacterial disease to be low, although this cannot be dismissed, says Rimstad.
Possibilities to reduce risk
Lumpfish and wrasse fish are most common to use as cleaner fish. Lumpfish is never or very seldom, reused. The probability of transmitting infection due to reuse of cleaner fish therefore concerns almost exclusively to wrasses.
- Risks could possibly be reduced by avoiding reuse of cleaner fish that have been in contact with sick salmon. Measures like frequent and complete fallowing of the facility, (both for cleaner fish and salmon, quarantine stocking and fish health inspections, and resusing only a small fraction of the cleaner fish, may alleviate the risks, says Rimstad.
Knowledge on transmission of pathogens from cleaner fish to farmed salmon is in general limited. In particular information on the disease status in wild-caught cleaner fish is scarce.
Factors such as lack of basic knowledge on disease development, and absence of specific diagnostic tools for cleaner fish infections, prevent a more complete assessement of risks from being made.
The Panel on Animal Health and Welfare is responsible for this opinion.