Leter du etter norsk innhold? Prøv vårt norske søk

Next generation risk assessment in practice

There is an ongoing shift in toxicology, from the classical animal experiments to the use of new assessment methodologies (NAMs). However, no complete evidence-based framework for the use of NAMs in chemical risk assessment are available.

The project “Next Generation Risk Assessment in Practice” is designed to be a practical step-by-step approach to the development of an evidence-based framework for human health hazard assessment based on NAMs. The framework will include tools and guidance’s, and the development will be based on existing evidence-based toxicology and systematic review principles. The project will provide generic and sector-independent tools and guidance’s to make it feasible to perform chemical risk assessment based on NAMs.

As part of the gradual incorporation and transition toward the use of NAMs, a framework for evidence-based use of NAMs in toxicological research and chemical risk assessment is required. Such a framework should ultimately incorporate at least the following principles:

  • Result in identification of all relevant NAM-generated evidence relating to the research question addressed in a systematic review or risk assessment.
  • Provide for the evaluation of the internal validity of NAM studies (propensity for systematic error due to how the study is designed and conducted).
  • Provide for the evaluation of the external validity of NAM studies (the degree to which results of a study can be translated/generalised to human adverse health effects).
  • Contribute to objectivity, robustness, transparency, and reproducibility in the hazard identification and characterisation process.
  • In its approach to normalising and structuring the description and analysis of NAMs, contribute to progress in the extent to which research data conforms to FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Re-usable) principles of open science.

Evidence-based hazard assessment can be separated into six modules:

1

Planning

2

Systematic literature search

3

Critical appraisal

4

Certainty in the evidence

5

Identify the point of departure

6

Uncertainty in the point of departure

An overview of the planned work in this project:

Module 3

Critical appraisal

  • Tools for evaluation of external validity of new assessment methodologies (NAMs)
  • Tools for evaluation of internal validity of NAMS
  • Checklists (reporting standards) for NAMs

Module 4

Certainty in the evidence

  • Guidance for evidence synthesis and evaluation of certainty in the overall body of evidence

Module 5

Point of departure

  • Guidance on the identification of the Point of Departure from NAMs

Module 6

Uncertainty

  • Guidance on the identification and evaluation of uncertainty in the Point of Departure